Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #4654Re: Some questions
From: Danny White
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 1990 10:36
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 1990 10:36
21 lines
1442 bytes
1442 bytes
>In article <1705@nyx.UUCP> bscott@nyx.UUCP (Ben Scott) writes:
>
>specific upgrades. What I think is really the case is that the marketing
>department just didn't want to talk about 500s, but that September will
>be the date for the upgrade packages for all Amigas <> 1000...
>
Could it be possible that there are changes (ie. trace cuts etc.) that
have to be made to the motherbord of the 500 that are different (or not
needed) to the 2000? Might it be that CBM hasn't figured out how to get
these changes handled by "authorized dealers" safely? This could be why
CBM is taking so long to give out a release date for the 500 upgrade.
This is just a guess, but it might be an explanation.
>. <<<<Infinite K>>>>
--
UUCP: ...!texbell!whitwiz!danny SNAIL:Danny White 1429 Glacier Dr.
INTERNET: danny@whitwiz.lonestar.org Plano, TX 75023
==========================================================================
"In order to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first
create the universe." -- Carl Sagan, Cosmos
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<danny.2395@whitwiz.lonestar.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!texsun!csccat!egsner!whitwiz!dannyReferences:
<428@spader.UUCP> <139323@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <1705@nyx.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!texsun!csccat!egsner!whitwiz!danny From: danny@whitwiz.lonestar.org (Danny White) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Some questions Message-ID: <danny.2395@whitwiz.lonestar.org> Date: 1 Aug 90 10:36:07 GMT References: <428@spader.UUCP> <139323@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <1705@nyx.UUCP> Lines: 21