🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <13867@cbmvax.commodore.com> valentin@cbmvax (Valentin Pepelea) writes:
>In article <5177@eklektik.UUCP> danbabcock@eklektik.UUCP (/dev/ph1) writes:
>>
>> The following are two bug/feature reports that I emailed to Commodore. I'm
>> posting them because I'm sure some other people are interested, and I'm not
>> sure if Commodore received my email (no response as of this writing).
>
>If you mailed the bug reports to bugs@cbmvax, hances are the mail was received.
>But you did not get a reply, because no reply was ever sent to you. It would be
>ideal for bugs@cbmvax to reply to you with the bug number that was assigned to
>your report, but alas that is not the case.

Sorry, he has no idea what he's talking about.  We do a reply
on emailed bug messages as an ACK before its entered in the database,
but rely on the return address being accurate.  They seem to bounce
a lot :-(

			andy
-- 
andy finkel		{uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy
Commodore-Amiga, Inc.

"Of course it's the murder weapon.  Who would frame someone with a fake?"

Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share.
I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.