🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1990Sep27.205201.25306@agora.uucp> billsey@agora.uucp (Bill Seymour) writes:
>In article <2277@trlluna.trl.oz> aduncan@rhea.trl.oz.au (Allan Duncan) writes:
>:No, no typos - this is what was sent to Australian developers as "2.0 B5".
>:I'm told that beta 6 will be released here RSN, along with the recent
>:American DevCon notes.
>:See - we are kept right up to date by Commodore Australia.
>:
>:What do you show for version, and what is it labelled as?
>
>	My current version kicks out:
>
>Kickstart version 36.197. Workbench version 36.77
>
>	That is labeled as 2.02 beta 2. 2.01 was Kickstart 36.143 and 2.0
>was Kickstart 36.141. Beta 6 was a 3000 release of beta 5, I believe.
>Hope they get you guys caught up soon! :-)

	NOTE: "Beta 6" for non-US companies is what the US calls "2.00
Release" aka KS 36.141 (or maybe 2.01 (aka 36.143), it may depend on the
country, I don't know for sure).  Note that Bill just got 36.197 a very
short time ago, it's not something that has been around any amount of time.
I'm not in CATS, and I don't know exactly what the criteria for being shipped
copies was (Commercial Developers for certain).  I can't talk much about
these, but I wish to avoid any confusion for people out there, particularily
the Beta 6 vs 2.0 release confusion.

#include <std/disclaimer.h>
-- 
Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Common phrase heard at Amiga Devcon '89: "It's in there!"