🚀 go-pugleaf

>In article <14941@cbmvax.commodore.com> jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) writes:
>In article <ben.2904@epmooch.UUCP> ben@epmooch.UUCP (Rev. Ben A. Mesander) writes:
>>I've been porting GNU Chess to the Amiga with Lattice 5.05. I've come
>>across a compiler message something along the lines of:
>>"Object size larger than 32768 bytes, some branches may be incorrect.
>>Please place subroutines in separate modules".
>>(That's not it, exactly... but from memory)
>>
>>This error message is not in the compiler manual. I'm compiling the source
>>code with the -r0 and -b0 options, which allow full 32-bit addressing for
>>code and data, so I would not expect any 32K size limit.
>
>	Try linking with lcnb.lib instead of lc.lib.  (Ditto for lcmnb.lib
>instead of lcm.lib.)  These are the -b0 versions of the libraries.
>

  I *am* linking with lcnb.lib. This message is coming from LC1, not the
linker, anyway. It turns out the message goes away if I turn off all the
debugging options. I'm not sure if it got better because of the code
size reduction, or if there is some problem with -b0 code generation and
the debugging options. It's making my Intuition interface for GNU Chess
hard to debug - lots of printf()'s...

>-- 
>Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering.
>{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
>Common phrase heard at Amiga Devcon '89: "It's in there!"

--
| ben@epmooch.UUCP   (Ben Mesander)       | "Cash is more important than |
| ben%servalan.UUCP@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu |  your mother." - Al Shugart, |
| !chinet!uokmax!servalan!epmooch!ben     |  CEO, Seagate Technologies   |