Re: Possible E-Clock fixes

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #5774

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#5774

From: Eric J. Schwertfeger
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 1990 22:06

12 lines
1175 bytes

	Has anybody considered dividing the E-Clock at the timer,
rather than at the chip?  I don't have my schematics available,
but it seems to me that the timer chip(s) might use a seperate
line for the counter and the chip select, if it needs both at all.
	This might make downshifting the clock speed more difficult,
but heck, if this fixes the timing problem, I'll just leave it at 
14 mhz :-)
	BTW, has anyone had any success with this hack using
12 Mhz 68010 chips?  If so, where did you get it?
-- 
Eric J. Schwertfeger, maniac@jimi.cs.unlv.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2076@jimi.cs.unlv.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!unsvax!jimi!lil-ed.cs.unlv.edu!maniac

References: <1990Oct11.193142.13719@ecst.csuchico.edu> <1990Oct12.124753.14723@sisd.kodak.com> <?|X%GN$@rpi.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!unsvax!jimi!lil-ed.cs.unlv.edu!maniac
From: maniac@lil-ed.cs.unlv.edu (Eric J. Schwertfeger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Possible E-Clock fixes
Message-ID: <2076@jimi.cs.unlv.edu>
Date: 12 Oct 90 22:06:55 GMT
References: <1990Oct11.193142.13719@ecst.csuchico.edu> <1990Oct12.124753.14723@sisd.kodak.com> <?|X%GN$@rpi.edu>
Sender: news@jimi.cs.unlv.edu
Reply-To: maniac@lil-ed.cs.unlv.edu (Eric J. Schwertfeger)
Organization: UNLV Computer Science and Electrical Engineering
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message