🚀 go-pugleaf

In a message posted on 18 Oct 90 15:17:54 GMT,
blubaugh@ucqais.uc.edu (pri=2 Dwight Blubaugh) wrote:
pDB>    But Everything that Commodore has said is that 2.0 will solve the
pDB>multiple-port problem.  Every reply so far leads me to believe that we

In order for it to solve it, it would have to have a device that called
another device, or would need to understand the hardware involved with each
serial device - There is no 'best' way to implement a serial device in hardware
- It really depends on what you want/need.

pDB>maintainence release.  Other E-mail replies has stated that C= has a
pDB>complete replacement serial.device with their 8 port card :-(

I don't know if I'd WANT to have to rely on the Commodore Serial software -
There are a few functions missing that are required (IE: DTR control under
a shared Serial port situation (VERY common)).

  So far I've found the ASDG serial device to be the best implementation,
which is why I bought their Duel-Serial board (IE: I don't use the internal
serial port).

  I still, for the life of me, can't undestand any reason for Commodore,
Supra, and so many other companies to not support a simple thing like DTR
control.  They end up forcing us to always go to the hardware directly which
is always a Bad idea - The FACT is that 'closing and re-opening' DOES NOT WORK!


---
  Opinions expressed in this message are my Own.  My Employer does not even
know what these networks ARE.

  Russell McOrmond   rwm@atronx.UUCP   {fts1,alzabo}!atronx!rwm 
  FidoNet 1:163/109  Net Support: (613) 230-2282
  Amiga-Fidonet Support  1:1/109