Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #6036Re: PIPEs
From: Russell McOrmond
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 1990 11:21
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 1990 11:21
30 lines
1464 bytes
1464 bytes
In a message posted on 19 Oct 90 23:31:48 GMT,
waggoner@dtg.nsc.com (Mark Waggoner) wrote:
MW>>I want true pipes so I think you should go for it. :-)
MW>I don't know if this is quite what you want, but ConMan, the
MW>console handler by William Hawes can be mounted as a pipe handler and
It does provide what we need - I myself seem to always end up with problems
when I use PIP: for anything.
MW>may provide what you are looking for. How exactly would you expect a
MW>"true" pipe handler to work, without significant cooperation from the
Yes, we want Un-named Pipes - To use in our own programs as opposed to being
used within a Shell.
MW>--
MW>Mark Waggoner Santa Clara, CA (408) 721-6306 waggoner@dtg.nsc.com
MW> Unofficially representing National Semiconductor Local Area Networks Group
MW> Officially misrepresenting myself.
:Later
---
Opinions expressed in this message are my Own. My Employer does not even
know what these networks ARE.
Russell McOrmond rwm@atronx.UUCP {fts1,alzabo}!atronx!rwm
FidoNet 1:163/109 Net Support: (613) 230-2282
Amiga-Fidonet Support 1:1/109
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<52839.656702476@atronx.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!fts1!atronx!rwmShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!fts1!atronx!rwm From: rwm@atronx.UUCP (Russell McOrmond) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: PIPEs Message-ID: <52839.656702476@atronx.UUCP> Date: Tue Oct 23 11:21:16 1990 Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.tech In-Reply-To: waggoner@icebox.UUCP (Mark Waggoner)