🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <15412@cbmvax.commodore.com> peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) writes:
>In article <458@faatcrl.UUCP> jprad@faatcrl.UUCP (Jack Radigan) writes:
>>jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) writes:
>>>	A note for all programmers out there: there is NO guarantee that
>>>location 0 will be 0.  References to location 0 are bugs, and enforcer will
>>>trap and report them.  Memmung stuffs a nasty value into location 0 to try
>>>to break incorrect programs.

>>Would've been nice if this was common knowledge *before* the 2091 hit the
>>streets.  Alot of programs got bit by this problem, and more than a few
>>were written by lawful coders too.

>I hope you're saying that lawful coders can make mistakes.  We strive

Just because something is lawful also doesn't mean that it is the
correct or most elegant way of doing things.  Depending on location 0
to hold a specific value isn't a very portable way of coding.  Even if
code is not intended to be ported, I think the programmer should try to
keep in mind techniques that lead to easy porting.  You never know.  I
guess still being a student I have extreme ideals (which are at times
impractical), such as if it's worth writing, it's worth writing well.

>Continued compatibility is a shared and vital goal for us and developers
>alike.
>>  -jack-
>     Peter
--
Chris Dailey   dailey@(frith.egr|cpsin.cps).msu.edu
"Rise again, rise again/Though your heart it be broken and life about to
end./No matter what you've lost, be it a home, a love, a friend,/
Like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again!" -- a song by the late Stan Rogers