Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #6235Re: Assembler File Requester?
From: Steve Palm
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 1990 00:04
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 1990 00:04
25 lines
1488 bytes
1488 bytes
In article <1990Oct29.063758.17779@engin.umich.edu>, milamber writes:
DSC> >> Instead, why not use the standard file requester in OS 2.0?
DSC> >
DSC> >Great, and die on all the 1.2 and 1.3 systems that are "out there".
DSC>
DSC> no point asking CBM for all these neat features if you're not going to
DSC> use them. You wanna use 1.2 and 1.3 forever?
That is the same attitude that would land us with the routines only found in
1.0, right? 8^) I sure am glad that CBM keeps adding functions to the ROMs
and supporting libraries, and that programmers use them.
The *only* downside to this would be if, as some people in FidoNet have come
to believe, Commodore decides that the A500 is not a professional machine and
will not receive 2.0. I see this as a moot point, because as far as I can see
CBM *will* release 2.0 on the 500.
--
/// AMIGA: | Steve Palm, Sysop of FidoNet node 1:11/16
/// FOR THE | UUCP: {gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!myamiga!smp
\\\/// CREATIVE | INTERNET: [not yet available]
\XX/ MIND |_________________________________________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<89.272D096E@myamiga.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!fps!myamiga!smpShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!fps!myamiga!smp From: smp@myamiga.UUCP (Steve Palm) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Assembler File Requester? Message-ID: <89.272D096E@myamiga.UUCP> Date: 30 Oct 90 00:04:47 GMT Organization: The Siberian Amiga --- Sault Ste. Marie, MI Lines: 25