🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1990Nov8.100654.9707@canterbury.ac.nz> chem194@canterbury.ac.nz (John Davis, programmer at large, chemistry department) writes:
>In article <hbrinch.0245@icoast.UUCP>, hbrinch@icoast.UUCP (henrik brinch) writes:
>>As I'm developing using DevPac2.08 on an Amiga 3000-25-100 I would like
>>to know if there's anybody out there, who have GenAm working perfectly
>>using single-stepping (on A3000) ?  

>I'm using DevPac fine on a 2500/030 ( effectively same as 3000 ), but I 
>know that the early ( 2.0 ) version of Monam2 barfed on 030's. 

The main difference between the A2500/30 and the A3000 in this case is the
memory addressing.  On an A2500/30, you're still happy with 24 bit addressing
unless there's any A2630 expansion memory (unlikely, since to my knowledge
there's only one such board in the world...).  The A3000's Fast memory is
well out of the 24 bit address range of the original 68000.  While it would
seem rather silly for a program like a Debugger of all things would be unable 
to use full 32 bit addresses, it's a good explanation of the problem you're
having.

I have actually used DevPac myself on an A2500/30, but never on an A3000.  I
did find it to be a decent integrated assembler system, though I'm not all that
sure there's a need to have an integrated assembler system on the Amiga, since
with AREXX you can build your own integrated system from your favorite pieces.

>| o  John Davis - CHEM194@canterbury.ac.nz               o |

-- 
Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Amiga 3000) "The Crew That Never Rests"
   {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh      PLINK: hazy     BIX: hazy
	Standing on the shoulders of giants leaves me cold	-REM