Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #6522Re: PIPEs
From: Larry Phillips
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 1990 19:41
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 1990 19:41
48 lines
2899 bytes
2899 bytes
In <1990Nov8.035305.14484@opusc.csd.scarolina.edu>, yarnall@opusc.csd.scarolina.edu (Ken Yarnall) writes:
>+
>+Seriously, if it weren't for the ability of Unix shells to accept the pipe
>+operator without delimiting whitespace, it would be a complete non-issue.
>+Nobody would even think to question it.
>
>What in the world makes you think that? It seems as obvious as any other
>evolution that has taken place that allows greater flexibility. I hereby
>declare that, even if Unix shells didn't allow whitespace surrounding pipe
>symbols, I would have thought of it.
Seems perfectly natural to me to use whitespace as a delimiter, especially
between conceptually diffent parts of a command line. As an 'OR' operator, the
'|' 'looks right' without whitespace because it separates two exact patterns,
and if those patterns have no embedded spaces, then you don't want them in
there. As a pipe operator it looks right (to me) with whitespace because its
function is a separate function from whatever exists on either side of it.
>In fact, as I recall, when I first started using pipes, I placed whitespace
>around them because it looked right, not because I read about it in the man
>pages. I also didn't put whitespace around the symbols when I wanted to
>crunch lots onto a line (I have this paranoid thing about real long command
>lines), without being told that it was a great `feature' of csh that I could
>decide which way I wanted to do it.
>
>Unix is a marvelous invironment, and every modern operating system probably
>owes it a bit of homage, but it is not the sacred chalise of All that is
>Right and Holy.
While I agree that flexibility in whitespace is a boon, I also think that
adding yet another character (or combination of characters), to mean 'pipe' is
a far more restrictive move than simply saying that the character preceding a
pipe character must be a space.
I don't think Unix is all right or holy either, and in fact I see a lot of
rather severe limitations in various aspects of it that we do not suffer from
on the Amiga.
-larry
--
It is not possible to both understand and appreciate Intel CPUs.
-D.Wolfskill
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| // Larry Phillips |
| \X/ lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
| COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 -or- 76703.4322@compuserve.com |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2201@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc! From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: PIPEs Message-ID: <2201@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> Date: 9 Nov 90 19:41:23 GMT Lines: 48 Return-Path: <lpami!lphillips> To: van-bc!rnews