Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #6562Re: Scheduler changed under 2.0?
From: GIAMPAL
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 1990 14:14
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 1990 14:14
18 lines
1311 bytes
1311 bytes
In article <15756@cbmvax.commodore.com>, peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) says: >In article <90312.082534GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu> GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu writes: >>between 2.0 and 1.3 of the OS. For example, on an A3000, if you start a ray- >>trace with TurboSilver and pop back to workbench to start up something like >>DeluxePaint, the entire system _seems_ locked, but then suddenly jumps back >>to life in little bursts. > >Are you running a utility called "enforcer" when you're under 2.0? Well unless "enforcer" is run in the startup-sequence by default, this isn't the case. The machine had basically been just pulled out of the box and set up. There is definitely something different going on, but I'm not quite sure what (time to buy ReSource '030 and figure out what you guys are doing in there :-) --dominic
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90316.091455GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!giampalReferences:
<90312.082534GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu> <15756@cbmvax.commodore.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!giampal From: GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Scheduler changed under 2.0? Message-ID: <90316.091455GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu> Date: 12 Nov 90 14:14:55 GMT References: <90312.082534GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu> <15756@cbmvax.commodore.com> Organization: The American University - University Computing Center Lines: 18