🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #7198

Re: Simple Frame Buffer boards

#7198
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 1990 03:41
20 lines
1397 bytes
In article <23699@grebyn.com> ckp@grebyn.UUCP (Checkpoint Technologies) writes:
> The 8 meg expansion address space of the Amiga is too precious  to
> devote a meg or more of it to "just" a frame buffer.

I don't know about that. Every A2000 already has a megabyte allocated to
pretty much that very purpose. If you're going to shove more than a few megs
of RAM into your 2000 you're likely to be running a 68020 or so and have
almost 2 gig of RAM-only address space available on your CPU card.

(yes, I know that most 68020 cards don't take advantage of >16M memory, but
 it's in the CPU's address space and should be used. The only problem with it
 is that you can't access it from the Zorro bus so you can't DMA to it, but
 that's a SMOP.)

I'd think that paged I/O cards would be a bit of a pain for any hypothectical
future device-independent graphics.library, too. Another reason to go to a
flat address space, no?
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7182@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!nuchat!sugar!peter
References: <916@boing.UUCP> <23699@grebyn.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!nuchat!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Simple Frame Buffer boards
Message-ID: <7182@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 2 Dec 90 03:41:07 GMT
References: <916@boing.UUCP> <23699@grebyn.com>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 20