Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #7298RE: Re:What's Wrong with ARP!!!
From: bacon
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 1990 17:06
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 1990 17:06
24 lines
1231 bytes
1231 bytes
RE: What's Wrong with ARP. Hasn't the point about ARP been made moot since WB 2.0 (soon to be 2.1) has been incorporated in toto into it?? In a conversation I had here with a fellow Amiga colleague, he stated that the sole purpose of ARP was to goad C= into action, which they have done. For those of us who may be less than enlightened, like you, would you mind telling us what some of the pitfalls of using ARP are? Especially since you are carrying this conversation publicly on NEWS. Also, those of us who have A1000's or A500's will have to stick to something like the ARP set unless we shell out the bucks for chip upgrades and the boards to go with them since WB2.X requires the Agnus 1meg chip. Please don't flame me for any ignorance. All of us are at different levels of experience and this is a public forum. Russ Bacon Internet BACON@ZEUS.UNOMAHA BITNET BACON@ZEUS.UNOMA1
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5435.2760c937@zeus.unomaha.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!zeus.unomaha.edu!baconShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!zeus.unomaha.edu!bacon From: bacon@zeus.unomaha.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: RE: Re:What's Wrong with ARP!!! Message-ID: <5435.2760c937@zeus.unomaha.edu> Date: 8 Dec 90 17:06:31 GMT Lines: 24