Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #7388WB 2.0 and Agnus (was Re:What's Wrong with ARP!!!)
From: Jim Shaffer
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 10:40
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 10:40
15 lines
1167 bytes
1167 bytes
>In article <5435.2760c937@zeus.unomaha.edu> bacon@zeus.unomaha.edu writes: >Also, those of us who have A1000's or A500's will have to stick to something >like the ARP set unless we shell out the bucks for chip upgrades and the >boards to go with them since WB2.X requires the Agnus 1meg chip. I was under the impression that 2.0 would NOT require the ECS. Since anyone you ask is likely to have a different opinion, could someone from Commodore please tell us whether this is true? -- paper : James Shaffer Jr., 37 Brook Street, Montgomery, PA 17752 uucp : uunet!cbmvax!amix!vanth!jms (or) rutgers!cbmvax!amix!vanth!jms domain: jms%vanth@amix.commodore.com CompuServe: 72750,2335 quote : ATTENTION ALL PLANETS OF THE SOLAR FEDERATION: WE HAVE ASSUMED CONTROL
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jms.1998@vanth.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!cbmvax!amix!vanth!jmsReferences:
<5435.2760c937@zeus.unomaha.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!cbmvax!amix!vanth!jms From: jms@vanth.UUCP (Jim Shaffer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: WB 2.0 and Agnus (was Re:What's Wrong with ARP!!!) Message-ID: <jms.1998@vanth.UUCP> Date: 11 Dec 90 10:40:22 GMT References: <5435.2760c937@zeus.unomaha.edu> Lines: 15