Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #7688

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#7688

From: Paul Shields
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 1990 04:32

8 lines
769 bytes

peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>5.0d has been completely reliable for me so far.

50.d has only given me one guru.. had something to do with
pre compiling the header files on the MXM.library

On the whole, it's quite a bit more reliable than the 5.0a 
I was using before.. especially in sdb.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <19404@yunexus.YorkU.CA>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!yunexus!shields

References: <9012161351.42.13@INSIDER> <7322@sugar.hackercorp.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!yunexus!shields
From: shields@yunexus.YorkU.CA (Paul Shields)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?
Message-ID: <19404@yunexus.YorkU.CA>
Date: 26 Dec 90 04:32:57 GMT
References: <9012161351.42.13@INSIDER> <7322@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Distribution: comp
Organization: York U. Computing Services
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message