🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7561@cbmvax.UUCP> daveh@cbmvax.UUCP (Dave Haynie) writes:
>in article <627@uranus.UUCP>, esker@abaa.uucp (Lawrence Esker) says:
>> Could you (or somebody) be the keeper of the bugs/patches, on the net.  
>
>The Software folks here certainly have a list of known bugs, and probably a
>list of patches or fixes (SetCPU can apply a fix, if it's reasonable, but most
>users can't modify their ROM and require a patch of some sort).  I certainly
>don't have the time to keep track of these things myself, the Software group
>would certainly have their own policies on what they want to make public, but
>certainly an interested 3rd party could catalog bugs and fixes, if such an
>interest can be found amongst the netwatchers around here.

	We have a 'bugs' topic in amiga.dev on bix (and a similar one for
commercial developers in amiga.com).  "Official" developer support is done
on bix, though we try to give a hand here too (when we can find the time). :-(
These topics often include discussion, and occasionally fixes, though they
do not contain every bug that we know about (and have in our internal bugs
database).  It is pretty comprehensive, though, and I think the entirety of
that discussion is on-line for searching/perusal/downloading.

>>     Is anybody able to talk and listen to IBM hardware designers the way
>>     we can with Dave, Randell, Carolyn, Paul, or others I don't recall
>>     offhand.  The ultimate in customer support.  Only Amiga makes it 
>>     possible. 
>
>It's nice to be appreciated!

That it is.

-- 
Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Common phrase heard at Amiga Devcon '89: "It's in there!"