Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #8425Re: IPC: Messages (again) [+ -- Oopsie.]
From: Pete Goodeve
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1988 06:07
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1988 06:07
27 lines
1487 bytes
1487 bytes
In article <895@nuchat.UUCP> Peter da Silva writes:
> Are you a Goon Show fan, too?
> (I talk to the trees, that's why they put me away)
Well, only a cardboard replica, actually. (You can't get the wood, y'know...)
>
> > Looks like we're forced into YAFF (Yet Another Bloody Field) in each item
>
> YABF, don't you mean? :->
As a matter of fact it was "Bloody" that was mis-substituted.... (:^))
>
> > void *IE_Ptr; /* points to defined data structure
> > ^ (could be within message block if IE_Flags says so) */
> > }; |
> \_ Shouldn't this column be an 'I' for 'Item' now?
Aye aye cap'n...
So -- do we actually have an agreed message format? Can we start using it?
Can we persuade anyone else to start using it?
-- Pete --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8720@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!mordor!sri-spam!ames!pasteur!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!peteReferences:
<7685@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <806@nuchat.UUCP> <7929@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <8250@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <895@nuchat.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!mordor!sri-spam!ames!pasteur!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!pete From: pete@violet.berkeley.edu (Pete Goodeve) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech,comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: IPC: Messages (again) [+ -- Oopsie.] Message-ID: <8720@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 14 Apr 88 06:07:35 GMT References: <7685@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <806@nuchat.UUCP> <7929@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <8250@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <895@nuchat.UUCP> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: pete@violet.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Pete Goodeve) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 26 Keywords: IPC Message Format