Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #8431Re: IPC
From: SLMYQ
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 1988 06:19
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 1988 06:19
7 lines
739 bytes
739 bytes
I don't think we really need a *method* of interprocess communication - messages
and ports are plenty for most anything. We don't need to define a standard
on *how* things are passed between processes. It's *what* we pass to *who*,
and how to find whoever. After all, you don't just send a message to any
port in the public port list, saying, "Hi! I'm DeluxePaint!".
Bryan Ford (SLMYQ@USU.BITNET)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8804060639.AA13382@jade.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!ucbvax!USU.BITNET!SLMYQShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!ucbvax!USU.BITNET!SLMYQ From: SLMYQ@USU.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: IPC Message-ID: <8804060639.AA13382@jade.berkeley.edu> Date: 6 Apr 88 06:19:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 7