Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #8438Re: Execute? Yes but!
From: Matt Dillon
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1988 18:42
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1988 18:42
16 lines
1004 bytes
1004 bytes
>My second idea: use LoadSeg/CreatProc/WBStartup/UnLoadSeg etc. ok, it seems >that C-A forgot that a process might return a return value to WorkBench. >Change the startup/exit protocol by adding this to the message? NO that >would break WorkBench. OK no return value from WB. What else??? > >My third idea: this works but is dirty, uses inside info on Dos etc. > >Your idea? Any official / compatible solution? If you find my shell source (*not* the drew version), it has two modules that handle loading and running a program and getting the return value. It's a mess. Most of the mess is to allow for running BCPL program. -Matt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8804071842.AA04690@cory.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Execute? Yes but! Message-ID: <8804071842.AA04690@cory.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 7 Apr 88 18:42:54 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 16