Re: Manxifying Lattice Code

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #9454

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#9454

From: Stuart H. Ferguson
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 1988 11:06

26 lines
1291 bytes

joe@dayton.UUCP (Joseph P. Larson) says:
>Stuart mentioned he was compiling with +L.  Is he also including the 32-bit
>libraries?  c32.lib and m32.lib instead of c.lib and m.lib?  This will make
>a difference [...]

Ah.  (slightly embarassed)  So *that's* what the c & m 32 libraries are for.
So now I know.

I recompiled with these libraries and it worked fine.  Thanx to all who
replied.

You see, I've never needed to use +L before ...

>Just another observation. -J

Indeed.

You know, that "Conquest" code is some of the worst I've ever seen.  It
looks like it was ported directly from basic.  It's forced me to create
some neat tools, however, which will probably make their way out into the
world at some point... Which is more than the "Conquest" code should have
done.
-- 
		Stuart Ferguson		(shf@well.UUCP)
		Action by HAVOC		(shf@Solar.Stanford.EDU)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6757@well.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!apple!well!shf

References: <6711@well.UUCP: <386@stsci> <5715@dayton.UUCP> <5716@dayton.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!apple!well!shf
From: shf@well.UUCP (Stuart H. Ferguson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Manxifying Lattice Code
Message-ID: <6757@well.UUCP>
Date: 7 Aug 88 11:06:33 GMT
References: <6711@well.UUCP: <386@stsci> <5715@dayton.UUCP> <5716@dayton.UUCP>
Reply-To: shf@well.UUCP (Stuart H. Ferguson)
Organization: The Blue Planet
Lines: 26

Reply to Parent Message