Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #9776Re: Is 14.32MHz too fast for my expansion RAM?
From: William Coldwell
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1988 09:24
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1988 09:24
42 lines
2646 bytes
2646 bytes
In article <0X-=awF28k-0QninBy@andrew.cmu.edu> mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes:
>grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) writes:
>> Unless you have some local high-speed memory, most likely on the speed-up
>> board, the extra clock speed will be mostly, but not quite completely
>> wasted... Of course, some people get excited about a 5-10% speed up,
>> so cases do differ. 8-)
>
>Perhaps someone who has one of these CMI speed-up boards would like
>to run the standard set of benchmarks (dhrystones, whetstones,
>khornerstones, flyntstones :-) on an accelerated and a stock Amiga
>and post the results -- especially results that depend on the
>optional 68881.
Well, I suppose that I could do something like that. I did write an
article for the local Amiga Users Group (NAG), and it's in the NAGRAG.
It was also distributed at AmiExpo. Though things have changed, most
of the timings are still fairly accurate.
>Also, some tests with real programs, such as time to load/scroll in
>WordPerfect, recalc a Maxiplan sheet, or perform a complex fill with
>DeluxePaint would be appreciated too.
>
>Michael Portuesi / Information Technology Center / Carnegie Mellon University
Now, let's keep our heads screwed on straight here... timings can be
- well - uh - biased. Compilers also rake havok on trying to get
accurate results. Another thing, is that if you set a program up to
use IEEE and show off the 68881, then without it the program will
run like a dead horse (or my ex-wife...)..
I suppose that I can upload a semi-reprint of the article and let you
see what I came up with (also remember that the 1000 will generally
show a difference in speed on things with interlace screens, like
(gasp!) Microbotics' FFUZ program.
Bill
--
William J. Coldwell - Amiga Attitude Adjuster {aka Software Developer}
(503) 684-9300 ...tektronix!reed!percival!billc "Blame the hardware."
[I break for 14MHz Processor Accelerators with 68881's.]
Creative Microsystems Inc. / 10110 SW Nimbus Suite B1 / Portland, OR 97223
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1361@percival.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!percival!billcReferences:
<3127@sdsu.UUCP> <4553@cbmvax.UUCP> <0X-=awF28k-0QninBy@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!percival!billc From: billc@percival.UUCP (William Coldwell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Is 14.32MHz too fast for my expansion RAM? Message-ID: <1361@percival.UUCP> Date: 13 Sep 88 09:24:40 GMT References: <3127@sdsu.UUCP> <4553@cbmvax.UUCP> <0X-=awF28k-0QninBy@andrew.cmu.edu> Reply-To: billc@percival.UUCP (William Coldwell) Distribution: comp.sys.amiga.tech Organization: Percy's UNIX, Portland, OR. Lines: 42