🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #9776

Re: Is 14.32MHz too fast for my expansion RAM?

#9776
From: William Coldwell
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1988 09:24
42 lines
2646 bytes
In article <0X-=awF28k-0QninBy@andrew.cmu.edu> mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes:
>grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) writes:
>> Unless you have some local high-speed memory, most likely on the speed-up
>> board, the extra clock speed will be mostly, but not quite completely
>> wasted...  Of course, some people get excited about a 5-10% speed up,
>> so cases do differ.  8-)
>
>Perhaps someone who has one of these CMI speed-up boards would like
>to run the standard set of benchmarks (dhrystones, whetstones,
>khornerstones, flyntstones :-) on an accelerated and a stock Amiga
>and post the results -- especially results that depend on the
>optional 68881.

Well, I suppose that I could do something like that.  I did write an
article for the local Amiga Users Group (NAG), and it's in the NAGRAG.
It was also distributed at AmiExpo.  Though things have changed, most
of the timings are still fairly accurate.

>Also, some tests with real programs, such as time to load/scroll in
>WordPerfect, recalc a Maxiplan sheet, or perform a complex fill with
>DeluxePaint would be appreciated too.
>
>Michael Portuesi / Information Technology Center / Carnegie Mellon University

Now, let's keep our heads screwed on straight here... timings can be
 - well - uh - biased.  Compilers also rake havok on trying to get
 accurate results.  Another thing, is that if you set a program up to
 use IEEE and show off the 68881, then without it the program will
 run like a dead horse (or my ex-wife...)..

 I suppose that I can upload a semi-reprint of the article and let you
 see what I came up with (also remember that the 1000 will generally
 show a difference in speed on things with interlace screens, like
 (gasp!) Microbotics' FFUZ program.

 Bill

-- 
    William J. Coldwell - Amiga Attitude Adjuster {aka Software Developer}
    (503) 684-9300 ...tektronix!reed!percival!billc  "Blame the hardware."
           [I break for 14MHz Processor Accelerators with 68881's.]
  Creative Microsystems Inc. / 10110 SW Nimbus Suite B1 / Portland, OR 97223
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1361@percival.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!percival!billc
References: <3127@sdsu.UUCP> <4553@cbmvax.UUCP> <0X-=awF28k-0QninBy@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!percival!billc
From: billc@percival.UUCP (William Coldwell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Is 14.32MHz too fast for my expansion RAM?
Message-ID: <1361@percival.UUCP>
Date: 13 Sep 88 09:24:40 GMT
References: <3127@sdsu.UUCP> <4553@cbmvax.UUCP> <0X-=awF28k-0QninBy@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: billc@percival.UUCP (William Coldwell)
Distribution: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Organization: Percy's UNIX, Portland, OR.
Lines: 42