Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #9987Re: Next Amiga system
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 1988 02:20
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 1988 02:20
14 lines
1014 bytes
1014 bytes
In article <QXGv0Vy00WA5A=x3dz@andrew.cmu.edu>, bm17+@andrew.cmu.edu (Bruce R. Miller) writes: > Mach is definitely not a real-time kernel. A real-time version will be > available soon (in a year or so). I know, it's my job. Really? I'm disappointed. But the principle still applies, and Mach certainly has all the hooks needed for real-time, such as multiple asynchronous waits and lightweight processes. What's real-time Mach going to be like? Maybe AmigaDOS can actually steal a march on mach? (many smileys). -- Peter da Silva `-_-' peter@sugar.uu.net Have you hugged U your wolf today?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2761@sugar.uu.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!bellcore!tness7!tness1!sugar!peterReferences:
<QXGv0Vy00WA5A=x3dz@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!bellcore!tness7!tness1!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Next Amiga system Message-ID: <2761@sugar.uu.net> Date: 8 Oct 88 02:20:33 GMT References: <QXGv0Vy00WA5A=x3dz@andrew.cmu.edu> Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston, TX Lines: 14