Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #1960Re: LUCAS woes
From: Doug Lee
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1989 05:52
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1989 05:52
21 lines
1102 bytes
1102 bytes
In article <3326@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> dirks@kaa.eng.ohio-state.edu (William R.Dirks) writes: >I am having some difficulty getting my LUCAS project to work. When I >I have tried the following parts for U9 at >both 16 and 20 MHz: stuff deleted to keep rn happy > 'LS74 (Signetics) Try using National 74LS74's. Also try as many brands of LS parts as you can find. Check the tolerances of R1 and R8 as they are critical. The brand of clock generator is also relevant. I find that KDS brand works better than Fox brand. There is also the possibility of a bad CPU. Someone brought me a board to debug which actually ran CPU cycles when viewed on a scope, but wouldn't boot due to a dead 68020. -- Doug Lee douglee@becker 416-461-5357
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1004@becker.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!becker!dougleeReferences:
<3326@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!becker!douglee From: douglee@becker.UUCP (Doug Lee) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: LUCAS woes Message-ID: <1004@becker.UUCP> Date: 2 Nov 89 05:52:13 GMT References: <3326@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> Reply-To: douglee@becker.UUCP (Doug Lee) Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario Lines: 21