Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #2618Re: window/event/conman questions
From: Mark Waggoner
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1989 19:37
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1989 19:37
15 lines
1240 bytes
1240 bytes
In article <4699@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >I thought ConMan was a straight drop in for CON:, just like NEWCON: is. If >that's the case, why wouldn't you have access to it from Xlisp? The method he was using to connect ConMan to the window is supported only by ConMan, not by CON: or NEWCON:. It is much easier than the methods you would need to use to connect a console handler to a window. It would mean, however, that you would HAVE to be using ConMan. -- Mark Waggoner Santa Clara, CA (408) 721-6306 waggoner@dtg.nsc.com Unofficialy representing National Semiconductor Local Area Networks Group Officially misrepresenting myself.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<377@icebox.nsc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!voder!dtg.nsc.com!waggonerReferences:
<29800002@inmet> <4688@sugar.hackercorp.com> <6377@stsusa.com> <4699@sugar.hackercorp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!voder!dtg.nsc.com!waggoner From: waggoner@dtg.nsc.com (Mark Waggoner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: window/event/conman questions Message-ID: <377@icebox.nsc.com> Date: 8 Dec 89 19:37:09 GMT References: <29800002@inmet> <4688@sugar.hackercorp.com> <6377@stsusa.com> <4699@sugar.hackercorp.com> Reply-To: waggoner@icebox.UUCP (Mark Waggoner) Organization: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara Lines: 15