ash vs ksh (Re: Bloody active rerouters. I give up. Message for koren.)

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #2289

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#2289

From: Peter da Silva
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1989 12:52

14 lines
1066 bytes

I complained about using $(cmd) rather than `cmd`.

In article <4926@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> sft@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (scott.thompson,ihp,) writes:
> Both are real unix!  $(prog) is valid ksh syntax!

I don't think so:

/usr/peter/News/232 $ echo $(echo hi)
ksh: syntax error: `(' unexpected
-- 
Peter "Have you hugged your wolf today" da Silva <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
`-_-'
 'U`  "Really, that tedious net etiquette stuff simply can't be expected
       to apply to an _Author_" -- Peter Merel <pete@basser.oz>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4587@sugar.hackercorp.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!wuarchive!texbell!sugar!peter

References: <4573@sugar.hackercorp.com> <4926@cbnewsc.ATT.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!wuarchive!texbell!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: ash vs ksh (Re: Bloody active rerouters. I give up. Message for koren.)
Message-ID: <4587@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 22 Nov 89 12:52:03 GMT
References: <4573@sugar.hackercorp.com> <4926@cbnewsc.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Distribution: na
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message