Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #2500Re: FCC approval needed??
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 1989 15:08
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 1989 15:08
16 lines
1277 bytes
1277 bytes
I said "make sure it'll pass FCC even if you don't do the paperwork".
In article <557@xdos.UUCP> doug@xdos.UUCP (Doug Merritt) writes:
> Absolutely. But what often happens is that they *don't* consider noise
> as a major factor when designing it. Then they start manufacturing/shipping
> and someone says "what about EMI & FCC?", and everybody says "Oh sh*t,
> now what?"
Well, that's a different case. The original message here was from someone who
*had* considered it and wanted to know if they should get FCC approval before
shipping in small quantities.
--
Peter "Have you hugged your wolf today" da Silva <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
`-_-'
'U` "Really, a video game is nothing more than a Skinner box."
-- Peter Merel <pete@basser.oz>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4658@sugar.hackercorp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!peterReferences:
<68558@psuecl.bitnet> <552@xdos.UUCP> <4645@sugar.hackercorp.com> <557@xdos.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: FCC approval needed?? Message-ID: <4658@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 3 Dec 89 15:08:27 GMT References: <68558@psuecl.bitnet> <552@xdos.UUCP> <4645@sugar.hackercorp.com> <557@xdos.UUCP> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 16