Thread View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by AXN100
Sat, 01 Dec 1990 16:26
CD-ROM vs. CD Players
Author: AXN100
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 1990 16:26
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 1990 16:26
9 lines
712 bytes
712 bytes
I have a Pioneer (sp) 6pack player. On the back there are two
pin-outs for a receiver to take control of the player. I was wondering
if there was anyway for me to use these pin-outs to let my amiga take
control of the CD player; thereby, making it into a CD-ROM jukebox.
Just Radom thoughts
Ajai
Re: CD-ROM vs. CD Players
Author: Kent Paul Dolan
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 1990 07:36
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 1990 07:36
37 lines
2129 bytes
2129 bytes
In article <90335.112615AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu> AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu writes: > I have a Pioneer (sp) 6pack player. On the back there are two pin-outs > for a receiver to take control of the player. I was wondering if there > was anyway for me to use these pin-outs to let my amiga take control > of the CD player; thereby, making it into a CD-ROM jukebox. I'm no world class expert on CD-ROM, so take this with a grain of salt. Both digital CD-ROM and audio CDs use binary data on the media, in the sense that it is either on or off, with no intermediate states. However, if I understand it right, in audio CDs, it is the _length_ of the "on" area or "off" area along the track, rather than its mere presence (as in the data bit on a digital CD-ROM), that is important, sort of like the zero crossing distance, rather than the amplitude, is the real signal in an FM radio signal, and it is this ability to ignore signal amplitude that lends the audio CD its enhanced sound reproduction ability. As a result, there is a profound incompatibility between the data storage signal recovery methods for audio CDs versus digital CD-ROMS, even though the mechanics of reading with a laser and so on are very similar. If this is right, you can't use a CD player to read digital CD-ROMS without a whole separate signal extraction "mechanism" behind the read laser. If I'm all wet here, I'm sure someone in the group can correct/expand on this. None of this says you couldn't let the Amiga work to control the CD player as a CD player, which might be a fun project in itself. Kent, the man from xanth. <xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us>
Re: CD-ROM vs. CD Players
Author: Mike Farren
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 1990 15:25
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 1990 15:25
34 lines
1958 bytes
1958 bytes
xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: >In article <90335.112615AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu> AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu writes: >However, if I understand it right, in audio CDs, it is the _length_ of >the "on" area or "off" area along the track, rather than its mere >presence (as in the data bit on a digital CD-ROM), that is important, >sort of like the zero crossing distance, rather than the amplitude, is >the real signal in an FM radio signal, and it is this ability to ignore >signal amplitude that lends the audio CD its enhanced sound reproduction >ability. >If this is right, you can't use a CD player to read digital CD-ROMS >without a whole separate signal extraction "mechanism" behind the read >laser. >If I'm all wet here, I'm sure someone in the group can correct/expand on >this. You're all wet, Kent :-) The fact is that the data is _encoded_ onto the CD by way of the length of the "on" or "off" areas, but that's not really all that much different from something like MFM encoding for a disk. It's one level down from anything you need to concern yourself with - both CD audio and CDROM do this, and both give you pure digital data once you strip off the encoding. The format for the data that comes out, however, IS significantly different between the two different media, though, so you might have some problems there. CD's sound reproduction ability is simply due to their 16-bit A/D circuitry, leading to a 96db dynamic range, far superior to ANY analog recording mechanism. -- Mike Farren farren@well.sf.ca.us
Re: CD-ROM vs. CD Players
Author: Thomas Elam
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 1990 02:49
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 1990 02:49
13 lines
1082 bytes
1082 bytes
In article <90335.112615AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu>, AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu writes: |> |> I have a Pioneer (sp) 6pack player. On the back there are two |> pin-outs for a receiver to take control of the player. I was wondering |> if there was anyway for me to use these pin-outs to let my amiga take |> control of the CD player; thereby, making it into a CD-ROM jukebox. Could you please post the pin-outs or wiring diagrams? Thanks. |> Just Radom thoughts |> Ajai Tom
Re: CD-ROM vs. CD Players
Author: Thomas Elam
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 1990 03:29
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 1990 03:29
64 lines
3718 bytes
3718 bytes
In article <1990Dec2.073639.22387@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>, xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: |> In article <90335.112615AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu> AXN100@psuvm.psu.edu writes: |> |> > I have a Pioneer (sp) 6pack player. On the back there are two pin-outs |> > for a receiver to take control of the player. I was wondering if there |> > was anyway for me to use these pin-outs to let my amiga take control |> > of the CD player; thereby, making it into a CD-ROM jukebox. |> |> I'm no world class expert on CD-ROM, so take this with a grain of salt. |> |> Both digital CD-ROM and audio CDs use binary data on the media, in the |> sense that it is either on or off, with no intermediate states. I agree. |> However, if I understand it right, in audio CDs, it is the _length_ of |> the "on" area or "off" area along the track, rather than its mere |> presence (as in the data bit on a digital CD-ROM), that is important, |> sort of like the zero crossing distance, rather than the amplitude, is |> the real signal in an FM radio signal, and it is this ability to ignore |> signal amplitude that lends the audio CD its enhanced sound reproduction |> ability. That would not be digital modulation. Digital modulation varies some aspect of the medium (for example, its optical diffusion or its local magnetic field) to precisely represent _numbers_ (often binary). What you are describing is Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). In PWM, the width of the pulses usually can meaningfully assume any value in a continuous range. Hence, PWM is _analog_. My explanation is not great, but I'm pretty sure of the essential idea. Audio CD's are digitally recorded on the medium. There are many recording errors, but these are corrected by big CRC's. I'm not sure, but I think audio CD's are recorded somewhat similarly to video CD's, because there are players that play both. On the other hand, could it be that the "pick up" is the same, but that the demodulation is different? Specifically, I'm wondering if the 4 or 5 MHz bandwidth needed for NTSC TV is obtained from a video disc by some kind of analog recording (perhaps the kind you described). |> As a result, there is a profound incompatibility between the data |> storage signal recovery methods for audio CDs versus digital CD-ROMS, |> even though the mechanics of reading with a laser and so on are very |> similar. I don't know. I do know that much of the technology from the audio CD's was adopted for CD-ROM's, allowing the large-scale economies of audio CD player manufacturing to reduce the costs of the CD-ROM players. |> If this is right, you can't use a CD player to read digital CD-ROMS |> without a whole separate signal extraction "mechanism" behind the read |> laser. |> |> If I'm all wet here, I'm sure someone in the group can correct/expand on |> this. |> |> None of this says you couldn't let the Amiga work to control the CD |> player as a CD player, which might be a fun project in itself. |> |> Kent, the man from xanth. |> <xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us> Tom
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads