Thread View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by MIGHTY MERLIN
Tue, 11 Dec 1990 21:53
Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?
Author: MIGHTY MERLIN
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 21:53
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 1990 21:53
21 lines
1298 bytes
1298 bytes
Friends.. I am interested in programming in C. I know a little bit about it. I'm fluent with Pascal. My question for anyone out there who knows is this: What are the big differences between the newest version of the Lattice C complier and the Aztec compiler? I'll be purchasing one of these soon. I would greatly appreciate any information that anyone wants to share. Thanks in advance-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | // MIGHTY MERLIN |UUCP:00jeeaton@bsu-ucs.uucp | | // "The sage of might"|bitnet:00jeeaton@bsuvax1.bitnet | | \\ // |internet:00jeeaton@bsu-ucs.bsu.edu | | \X/ | bsu-cs!bsu-ucs!00jeeaton | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?
Author: Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meye...
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 1990 22:02
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 1990 22:02
26 lines
1583 bytes
1583 bytes
In article <52153@bsu-ucs.uucp> 00jeeaton@bsu-ucs.uucp (MIGHTY MERLIN) writes: Friends.. I am interested in programming in C. I know a little bit about it. I'm fluent with Pascal. My question for anyone out there who knows is this: Rather than spending money on one of those, I recommend you find someone local with the Fish disks, and get one of the three or 4 freely distributable C compiles. I haven't used any of them, but know of people who've used them all. From what I've heard, DICE is the best, and has the advantage that you can get a "complete" distribution that includes the Amiga-specific includes by registering it. Note: this is suitable for unix-like programming on the Amiga. You'll need the include files that are licensed by CBM in order to do amiga-specific things. But for just fooling with C, what's in the packages should get you started. BTW, I use Lattice. Excellent product, with excellent support. The latter is the cricital issue. <mike --
Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?
Author: Stephen Walton
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 1990 21:17
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 1990 21:17
20 lines
1525 bytes
1525 bytes
In article <MWM.90Dec12160245@raven.relay.pa.dec.com>, mwm@raven (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) writes: >DICE Agreed. The test-it-yourself version of DICE is very nice, and very comfortable for someone who's used Unix. I can't justify using it until Matt puts in in-line 68881 code generation, though. >BTW, I use Lattice. Excellent product, with excellent support. The >latter is the cricital issue. I use Manx. Excellent product, increasingly poor support. If I had the $$ for a new compiler, I'd be switching to SAS/C. (Long time net readers know that I've owned the Manx compiler since it was first released in mid-1986, so this is quite a statement for me to make. I'll retract it in public when things change for the better.) ------------------------------- Stephen Walton, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Cal State Univ. Northridge I am srw@csun.edu no matter WHAT the stupid From: line says!
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads