🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
6 messages
6 total messages Started by Larry Phillips Thu, 03 Jan 1991 19:44
Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!!
#7792
Author: Larry Phillips
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 1991 19:44
34 lines
1936 bytes
In <7448@sugar.hackercorp.com>, peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <2450@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) writes:
>> >NEVER stick anything in C: that's not part of the distribution. It's just
>> >asking for trouble.
>
>[Larry lists his C:]
>> 508 files - 4 directories - 19696 blocks - 9625879 bytes
>
>OK, why? What's wrong with path:?

Path is braindead. One day I will write an ARexx front-end for it so that I can
delete one entry in the path, or insert an entry, without having to muck about
doing things to it manually. I only use PATH under a few circumstances, and
then I like to reset it and forget about it.

>> I NEVER let anyone mess with my C: directory. Not even by remote control,
>> via scripts. :-)
>
>You obviously don't have people coming over while you're at work, when your
>wife doesn't now enough about the machine to keep an eye on them.

Right. I am pretty much the sole user of my machines. My wife plays the
occasional game, or writes a few letters, but for the most part, it's under my
direct control.

-larry

--
The best way to accelerate an MsDos machine is at 32 ft/sec/sec.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                                 |
| \X/    lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322  -or-  76703.4322@compuserve.com        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!!
#7846
Author: Peter da Silva
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 1991 14:06
37 lines
1315 bytes
In article <2467@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) writes:
> Path is braindead.

Expand on this. I don't have any problems with it.

> One day I will write an ARexx front-end for it so that I can
> delete one entry in the path, or insert an entry, without having to muck about
> doing things to it manually.

PATH directory REMOVE
PATH directory ADD

How automatic would you like to get?

Here's my PATH:

1.SYS> PATH
Current directory
Ram Disk:
System2.0:C
System2.0:Utilities
System2.0:Rexxc
System2.0:System
System2.0:S
System2.0:Prefs
System2.0:Wbstartup
System2.0:Tools
Work:c
Work:System
Work:uucp/c
Work:Aztec/Bin
C:

Do you really have ALL that junk in C:? Sigh...
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!!
#7826
Author: Dennis Heffernan
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 1991 20:26
29 lines
1597 bytes
In article <7460@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <2467@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) writes:
>> Path is braindead.
>
>Expand on this. I don't have any problems with it.
>
>> One day I will write an ARexx front-end for it so that I can
>> delete one entry in the path, or insert an entry, without having to muck about
>> doing things to it manually.
>
>PATH directory REMOVE
>PATH directory ADD
>
>How automatic would you like to get?
>
>Peter da Silva.   `-_-'

	Using PATH ADD will add a directory to the end of your path- what if
you want to change something in the MIDDLE?  You have to reset the whole darn
thing.

	As far as ARP goes, the Commode (sic) commands were out of my C 
directory within hours of my machine's setup.  Never had a problem with them.


dfrancis@tronsbox.xei.com   ...uunet!tronsbox!dfrancis     GEnie: D.HEFFERNAN1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I don't understand why you make such a big deal out of everything...haven't
you learned; if it's not happenning to me it's not important?" -Murphy Brown
Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!!
#7855
Author: Peter da Silva
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 1991 19:02
12 lines
1114 bytes
In article <418@tronsbox.xei.com> dfrancis@tronsbox.xei.com (Dennis Heffernan) writes:
> 	Using PATH ADD will add a directory to the end of your path- what if
> you want to change something in the MIDDLE?  You have to reset the whole darn
> thing.

I think this goes in the category of "getting too cute with your setup". I've
got a pretty hairy PATH and I've never even considered that it might be nice
to have that capability. What would you need to do that for (real life examples,
please, not hypotheticals...)?
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!!
#7860
Author: Dan Barrett
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 1991 23:10
24 lines
1518 bytes
In article <7460@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>PATH directory REMOVE
>PATH directory ADD
>How automatic would you like to get?

	In another message, Peter requested a "real life" example where
these commands are not sufficient.  Here's one that I have encountered
several times.  There is no convenient way to add a directory the end of
your search path.  You have to RESET and ADD everything back.

	On UNIX it's simple:

		$ PATH=$PATH:newdirectory

Maybe we'll never see "PATH directory INSERT", but I'd sure like to have
"PATH directory APPEND".

                                                        Dan

 //////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
| Dan Barrett, Department of Computer Science      Johns Hopkins University |
| INTERNET:   barrett@cs.jhu.edu           |                                |
| COMPUSERVE: >internet:barrett@cs.jhu.edu | UUCP:   barrett@jhunix.UUCP    |
 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////
Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!!
#7950
Author: s.desmarais
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 1991 01:43
29 lines
1966 bytes
In <7471@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:

>In article <418@tronsbox.xei.com> dfrancis@tronsbox.xei.com (Dennis Heffernan) writes:
>> 	Using PATH ADD will add a directory to the end of your path- what if
>> you want to change something in the MIDDLE?  You have to reset the whole darn
>> thing.

Well, not even Unix allows that, short of using tools like 'sed' and such.
At least, however, it allows adding to either the end or the front of the PATH.

>I think this goes in the category of "getting too cute with your setup". I've
>got a pretty hairy PATH and I've never even considered that it might be nice
>to have that capability. What would you need to do that for (real life examples,
>please, not hypotheticals...)?
>-- 
>Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
><peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.

One such example is when you have some commands with the same name has the
Commodore supplied one, and want your own before in the PATH.  However, it's
true that you usually do that in the startup-sequence.  It would be nice
to be able to add either to the end or front (I know, I'm repeating myself).

sdesmara@sobeco.com
-- 
Stephane M. Desmarais               sdesmara@sobeco.com
Division STS - Groupe Sobeco Inc.   {uunet | mcgill-vision}!sobeco.com!sdesmara
505 boul Rene-Levesque Ouest        bur: (514) 878-9090 poste 297
Montreal, Quebec                    fax: (514) 875-2673
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads