Thread View: comp.sys.apple2.gno
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Guy Umbright
Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:12
Tentative date on 1.1?
Author: Guy Umbright
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:12
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:12
12 lines
978 bytes
978 bytes
Jawaid (and all the rest), do you guys have a tentative date for release 1.1 of GNO/ME? Is it close? far? extra-dimensional? Just wodering.. (P.S. an answer like 'GNO, not yet' will be dealt with in a most severe fashion :) ) -- : vagrant@vpnet.chi.il.us : A man said to the universe: : Stephen : : or vagrant@holonet.net : "Sir, I exist!" : Crane : : : "The fact has not created in me : 1899 : : Apple II Forever : a sense of obligation." : :
Re: Tentative date on 1.1?
Author: Jawaid Bazyar
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 06:05
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 06:05
25 lines
1371 bytes
1371 bytes
vagrant@vpnet.chi.il.us (Guy Umbright) writes: >Jawaid (and all the rest), do you guys have a tentative date for >release 1.1 of GNO/ME? Is it close? far? extra-dimensional? >Just wodering.. >(P.S. an answer like 'GNO, not yet' will be dealt with in a most > severe fashion :) ) :-) We don't know precisely what's in store for us (and the kernel) for the TCP/IP implementaiton; when we have a better handle on that we'll do some man-hours estimates. This will happen within a few weeks. Past that, I can't say. There's a lot of stuff going into 1.1 and most of it depends on the TCP/IP code or will be driven by the design of that code. -- Jawaid Bazyar | Ask me about the GNO Multitasking Environment Procyon, Inc. | for the Apple IIgs! bazyar@cs.uiuc.edu | P.O Box 620334 --Apple II Forever!-- | Littleton, CO 80162-0334 (303) 933-4649
Re: Tentative date on 1.1?
Author: Derek Taubert
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 23:27
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 23:27
67 lines
3690 bytes
3690 bytes
>(P.S. an answer like 'GNO, not yet' will be dealt with in a most > severe fashion :) ) Oh, I can't resist... As soon as we figure it out, we'll let you GNO. ;-) > We don't know precisely what's in store for us (and the kernel) > for the TCP/IP implementaiton; when we have a better handle on that > we'll do some man-hours estimates. This will happen within a few > weeks. Jawaid and I have a lot of thinking to do about this. We would rather plan it out and do it right the first time than to have to do it again later. I suppose now would be as good a time as any to talk about what will be provided by the TCP/IP stuff. (drum roll...) I'll be glad to answer questions from those to whom the following doesn't mean much. All of this should be available when GNO 1.1 ships. Interface support: SLIP built in (no dialupip or CSLIP, this will be later) MacIP over LocalTalk (for those of you with access to LocalTalk nets with FastPath routes on them) When it becomes available, ethernet - the software is written already, it's just a matter of getting the hardware Internals: IP, ICMP, UDP, TCP socket interface to UDP and TCP (just like BSD) Dynamic routing (a routed and RIP can be done later) ARP capable of supporting multiple hardware types (E-net, Atalk, etc.) Provided utilities: netstat, ping, possibly other cool debugging utils right now, I have tftpd implemented as a standalone daemon there will be an actual inetd (need sockets :-) that operates exactly like BSD's either Jawaid or I will provide a library for host information and machine name lookup (like BSD's) IP, ICMP, and UDP are essentially done. I'm in the process of putting together TCP now - it's a big one, and there is a certain amount of flexibility allowed to the programmer that isn't specified in the RFC's. For those of you who were worried about performance, don't. I've been able to get tftp (UDP) transfers over SLIP (19200) as fast as 1000cps, and this is with some amount of debugging and without completely optimized serial drivers. When I get a FastPath to play around with LocalTalk, I'm sure it will fly. Jawaid and I are pretty sure that once the socket support it completed, we should be able to take most of the TCP utils and simply compile them. :-) This includes ftp, telnet, smtp, nntp, whatever (yes, even an NFS server). When info on the FST's become available, I hope to do an NFS FST so that the IIgs can also be a NFS client. All of this is written to properly utilize multitasking. The drivers are interrupt driven, and the rest of the code relies on semaphores to put it into motion. What this means to you is that you won't even notice that it is there and running unless it is doing something. Well, except that it takes up memory, but I'll optimize it to use as little ZP as possible. If you have suggestions, now is the time. This will be as complete as I can possibly make it, and I am willing to entertain requests. Release will be binaries only, but free for the asking (I want to hold on to the source code, if you don't mind...). You shouldn't ever have to pay for networking, on any platform. Derek
Re: Tentative date on 1.1?
Author: jeremy
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 14:00
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 14:00
17 lines
1427 bytes
1427 bytes
In article <1992Dec23.232754.26136@slab.slip.uiuc.edu> derek@slab.slip.uiuc.edu (Derek Taubert) writes: > Jawaid and I are pretty sure that once the socket support it completed, we > should be able to take most of the TCP utils and simply compile them. :-) > This includes ftp, telnet, smtp, nntp, whatever (yes, even an NFS server). > When info on the FST's become available, I hope to do an NFS FST so that the > IIgs can also be a NFS client. This would be very nice!! What about something like pcnfs (or pcnfsd I guess it would be on the //GS). This looks like a _very_ ambitious project so I understand some of the time limitations but I am curious about whether this could be done also. You know being set up as an NFS client, I could steal some of the .5GB drive that the 386 running OS/2 beside me has. Now that would be a good use! Jeremy Rand RS/6000 Support
Re: Tentative date on 1.1?
Author: John MacLean
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 21:07
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 21:07
29 lines
1891 bytes
1891 bytes
In article <1992Dec23.232754.26136@slab.slip.uiuc.edu> derek@slab.slip.uiuc.edu (Derek Taubert) writes:
>
>I suppose now would be as good a time as any to talk about what will be
>provided by the TCP/IP stuff. (drum roll...) I'll be glad to answer questions
>from those to whom the following doesn't mean much. All of this should be
>available when GNO 1.1 ships.
>
>Interface support:
> SLIP built in (no dialupip or CSLIP, this will be later)
> MacIP over LocalTalk (for those of you with access to LocalTalk nets
> with FastPath routes on them)
> When it becomes available, ethernet - the software is written already,
> it's just a matter of getting the hardware
>Derek
Is there any confirmation yet that Apple's Ethernet card will allow
direct TCP/IP access, or are you referring to some other hardware?
I'd really like to plug my GS into an ethernet TCP/IP network, so tell me
exactly what hardware and software I would need (Apart from a GS,
and GNO 1.1 :-).
BTW, RPCs would be really nice, but if you get 3/4 of what your proposing
going I'll be really impressed!
--
This net: johnmac@fawlty.towers.oz.au Phone: +61 2 427 2999
That net: uunet!fawlty.towers.oz.au!johnmac Fax: +61 2 427 7072
Snail: Tower Technology, 1 Apollo Pl, Home: +61 2 449 5930
Lane Cove, NSW 2066, Australia.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads