🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #1783

Re: Version Number Confusion

#1783
From: Ken Badertscher
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1989 22:19
21 lines
1226 bytes
In article <8906121449.AA01174@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> VBRANDT@DBNUAMA1.BITNET writes:
| Don't forget that many people only have a monochrome monitor. :-)

Indeed... ;-)

| Does anyone ever check there ??  I doubt it.  Since Atari documented Sversion()
| as "the OS version call" (and the IBM equivalent *does* return the current OS
| version number), many people relied on that call.

Honk.  Wrong... Sversion is documented as follows:

  "Return GEMDOS's (sic) version number (in byte-reversed format)....
   GEMDOS version numbers and TOS version numbers are *not* one and the same."

Thanks for your support.


-- 
   |||   Ken Badertscher  (ames!atari!kbad)
   |||   Atari R&D System Software Engine
  / | \  #include <disclaimer>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1561@atari.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!sun!imagen!atari!kbad
References: <8906121449.AA01174@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!sun!imagen!atari!kbad
From: kbad@atari.UUCP (Ken Badertscher)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Version Number Confusion
Summary: Sversion returns GEMDOS version number (again)
Message-ID: <1561@atari.UUCP>
Date: 13 Jun 89 22:19:19 GMT
References: <8906121449.AA01174@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: kbad@atari.UUCP (Ken Badertscher)
Organization: Atari Corp., Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 21