Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #20019Re: So what does this mean to us ?
From: Jan T. Kim
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:28
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:28
51 lines
3194 bytes
3194 bytes
In <72174@cup.portal.com> Bob_BobR_Retelle@cup.portal.com writes: >Mark Hughes writes some stuff: >>I discovered that replacing my ST with another decent system, >>without taking any sacrifices (pathetic sound and OS on the PCs, weird OS >>and incompatibility on the Mac (not to mention their expense), etc.), I >>had to go up to a NeXT. >Wow.. now THERE's an open mind for you.. too bad you didn't >actually take a good look at what else is available in the world. >In addition to the terrific sound and operating systems on PCs, >and the smooth operating system on Macs, you also get the >advantages of support from the company that made your computer, >AND the not inconsequential benefit of wonderful software support >from developers who are *happy* to be in the market. You may well be able to claim that there are excellent operating systems for PCs, no problem so far. However, MS DOS, Windows, Windows NoThanx etc. are not among them. Regarding Macs, if you say their OS is smooth you must have taken a very superficial look at it. I agree, the OS "looks and feels" rather neat, but beyond that surface there are nightmares and loads of weird stuff buried. Beware. Also, remember that there are a lot of different things pepole may want to do with their computer. If someone just wants to run a word processor, a spreadsheet and a graphics program, he can do that on a PC running Windows or on a Mac, despite all the horrors buried in them. Even more, a Mac or PC may actually suit such a person's need better than an Atari. But if someone wants to do some programming too, he will probably be much better off with an Atari. What I'd like to point out is, there are problems with all systems you can get right now, with Ataris, PCs Macs, Amigas etc.etc. That's what life is like. Each system has its strengths, and each has its weaknesses. There's no point in making generals statements about how great or how rotten the Atari computers are. They have their problems and they have their merits, and there are enough advantages Ataris have over other systems to justify the claim that one can't move to another system without taking any sacrifices unless he moves to a system that belongs to another league price-wise and performance-wise altogether. Greetinx, Jan +- Jan Kim -- X.400: S=kim;OU=vax;O=mpiz-koeln;P=mpg;A=dbp;C=de -+ | Internet: kim@vax.mpiz-koeln.mpg.dbp.de | | | *----=< hierarchical systems are for files, not for humans >=-----*
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1h78n5INNohd@rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rrz.uni-koeln.de!not-for-mailReferences:
<72071@cup.portal.com> <JZR5VB3w165w@comtch.spk.wa.us> <72174@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rrz.uni-koeln.de!not-for-mail From: aeg03@rrz.uni-koeln.de (Jan T. Kim) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: So what does this mean to us ? Date: 22 Dec 1992 15:28:53 +0100 Organization: Regional Computing Center, University of Cologne Lines: 51 Message-ID: <1h78n5INNohd@rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE> References: <72071@cup.portal.com> <JZR5VB3w165w@comtch.spk.wa.us> <72174@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: kim@vax.mpiz-koeln.mpg.dbp.de NNTP-Posting-Host: rs1.rrz.uni-koeln.de