Re: Falcon screen

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #21005

#21005

From: Peter Missel
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 20:11

8 lines
817 bytes

w>        640x480x16bit PAL(interlaced) = 640x240x16bit VGA
w>
w>... as far as slow down is concerned (since interlaced is effectively 30Hz).

sorry, wrong guess. 640x240x16bit VGA would be the same for slowdown as
640x480x16bit is, since line doubling doesn't reduce falcons' bus load.

640x480x16bit interlaced == 320x480x16bit VGA (this mode exists!)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <A45186@K.maus.de>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!artcom0!hb.maus.de!k.maus.de!Peter_Missel

References: <A55926@HB.maus.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!artcom0!hb.maus.de!k.maus.de!Peter_Missel
From: Peter_Missel@k.maus.de (Peter Missel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Falcon screen
Message-ID: <A45186@K.maus.de>
Date: 13 Dec 92 20:11:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: K.A45186
References: <A55926@HB.maus.de>
Organization: MausNet (Mitglied im IN e.V.)
Lines: 8
X-Gateway: MausGate/News 1.14D/hb

Reply to Parent Message