Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #2175Atari GEM and GEM/3...
From: "Chuck Rickard; ", PC
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 1989 02:30
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 1989 02:30
16 lines
1356 bytes
1356 bytes
While installing Xerox Ventura Publisher 2.0 on a friends 286 machine, I had
to go through the process of installing GEM on his hard drive. It was kind of
weird having to load GEM from disk, but I had to do it anyway... Much to my
surprise when I started GEM, I had to ugly looking windows and a wimpy menu
bar to look at. These windows couldn't even be sized! From what I remember,
Xerox was sued by Apple (during the sueing days...) for infringing on the
"look and feel" of the Macintosh Desktop. Was this drastic change to GEM a
part of that legal action, or was it voluntary? (The former seems more likely
than the latter...) If the suit did make them change, why didn't Atari have
to change their GEM, considering it was identical to the original IBM GEM?
Allan, would like to explain this one for me? :-)
Chuck Rickard
UMBC Academic Computing
CHUCK@UMBC
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8907030235.AA29001@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UMBC1.UMBC.EDU!chuckShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UMBC1.UMBC.EDU!chuck
From: chuck@UMBC1.UMBC.EDU ("Chuck Rickard; ", PC)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Atari GEM and GEM/3...
Message-ID: <8907030235.AA29001@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 3 Jul 89 02:30:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 16