Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #2228why zoo...
From: Michal Jaegermann
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 19:40
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1989 19:40
21 lines
1458 bytes
1458 bytes
In response to Lee Dickey question why zoo is preferable over arc.
Besides of a possibility of storing the whole tree of subdirectories
(which can be fairly important, but can be achieved also with arc'ed
shar or tar format) there is also a business of recovery.
Recently I had a dubious pleasure of receiving a huge corrupted zoo
archive - gdb sources from terminator server. It would be a total
waste if this would be compressed with arc. Using fiz and editor I was
able to recover everything but two(?) files, which I replaced with some
luck. It is true that I had to recompile fiz, since posted version
apparently is writing directly to a console, instead of stdout, and
I had no way to capture it's output to a file. It was far too big to
be dealt with by hand. After I done that a quick run of awk on output
file, which produced a command file for gulam, was all what was needed
to enable an automatic rescue operation. Does anybody know how
to do something like that with .arc file? I don't.
Michal Jaegermann
Myrias Research Corporation
Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA
...{ncc, alberta}!myrias!mj
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<615670847.12121@myrias.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncc!myrias!mjShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncc!myrias!mj From: mj@myrias.uucp (Michal Jaegermann) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: why zoo... Message-ID: <615670847.12121@myrias.uucp> Date: 5 Jul 89 19:40:46 GMT Organization: Myrias Research, Edmonton Lines: 22