Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #22838ADVOCACY: RE: 386SX prices
From: Peter Kocourek
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 00:33
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 00:33
16 lines
1030 bytes
1030 bytes
I. Barnett wrote in a message on 18 Jan 93 to All IB> You are saying that a 386sx is outdated? Do you mean that a IB> 32 bit processor that communicates only 16 bits at a time is IB> too slow? Gee, didn't I just describe the Falcon030's architecture? IB> Wake up. If you contend that the 386sx is useless, then you IB> have to admit that the Falcon's (and Mac IIsi, Classic II, IB> and LCII) are equally as useless. Whoa! The IIsi has a full 32 bit bus, unlike the LC and LC II. After all, the IIsi is a _real_ Mac. :-) The system runs at 20 MHz, and with a 68882 added to it (as I have) it runs fairly consistently at half the speed of a IIfx. YHS:QSI! (A slightly irate IIsi owner :-))
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<727576933.AA01169@contrast.wlink.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!wtrlnd!contrast!postmasterShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!wtrlnd!contrast!postmaster From: qsi@contrast.wlink.nl (Peter Kocourek) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: ADVOCACY: RE: 386SX prices Message-ID: <727576933.AA01169@contrast.wlink.nl> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 00:33:50 Sender: postmaster@contrast.wlink.nl Lines: 16