Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #22859Re: James Hague and clouded minds
From: James Hague
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 19:28
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 19:28
48 lines
3115 bytes
3115 bytes
In article 07253253@cc4.crl.aecl.ca, csullogg@cc4.crl.aecl.ca () writes: > >Not power hungry; just not stupid. Please explaing WHY >someone should buy an SX system today. I would LOVE >to hear why this person would not have a clouded mind. >It is easy to toss out cute comments on the net that >seem philosophical and have a point. Please back up >your statement on clouded minds. This should be >fascinating! Hey, I've finally made it into a subject line! Ahhh...my life is complete. Of _course_ no one should buy am SX system today--heck the difference between an 8088 and 386DX system is negligible these days, so why not go with the faster one? Saving a few pennies (literally) by buying an SX is pointless. But this wasn't what my cute comment was about. You stated that the 386sx was a worthless processor without any merits whatsoever. IMO that's completely off base. The 68000 in the ST is still very viable for many people. Ditto for a 386sx based PC. I have done serious software development on one, played popular games like Wolfenstein 3-D and Civilization, done heavy duty word processing, managed databases, etc, on a 386sx with no speed problems at all. In fact, for most things I do I don't even need this much processor. I _don't_ run Windows or OS/2, though, and I don't use any of those monster Windows word processors/DTP packages. For such things I admit that a 386sx is not very suitable. It is debatable, though, whether this is simply because the processor is underpowered or the software in question was poorly designed. That was my point, that all the current "gotta have speed, speed, speed" thinking has clouded people's minds about what speed really is. Lots of people think you need a 486 just to do word processing. [I'm no dummy about 80x86 processors either. Want to talk about instruction timings? Assembly level optimization? I'm game.] The one thing I _do_ have a complaint about is the speed with which processors are dumped by the market and considered obsolete. As late as mid-1992 there were still lots of companies selling 386sx based systems. And a lot of people bought them. Telling these people that they now have to upgrade, a year later, is pretty rotten IMO. Even if a new motherboard only costs $200. -- James Hague exuhag@exu.ericsson.se
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan20.192854.23009@exu.ericsson.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!s09a05!exuhagReferences:
<20JAN93.07253253@cc4.crl.aecl.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!s09a05!exuhag
From: exuhag@exu.ericsson.se (James Hague)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: James Hague and clouded minds
Message-ID: <1993Jan20.192854.23009@exu.ericsson.se>
Date: 20 Jan 93 19:28:54 GMT
References: <20JAN93.07253253@cc4.crl.aecl.ca>
Sender: news@exu.ericsson.se
Reply-To: exuhag@exu.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Richardson, TX
Lines: 48
Nntp-Posting-Host: s09a05.exu.ericsson.se
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.