Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #22882Re: The compatibility story (Falcon & A1200)
From: dlk0ms9s
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 16:07
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 16:07
60 lines
2919 bytes
2919 bytes
In article <1993Jan9.150240@cs.bham.ac.uk>, dxo@cs.bham.ac.uk (David Oakley) writes: > In article <H.mcBUgFWEjuY@fredrik.atari.no>, jornmoe@fredrik.atari.no (Joern Moe) writes: > |> > |> Comodore officialy say that 60% of current A500 software works on the A1200. > |> Impressive? I don't think so! > |> > |> Compo (large german company that develop and sell ST/TT/Falcon software and > |> hardware addons) have had a thorough test of a large base of existing ST > |> software to see if it worked on the Falcon 030, and they found that 95% (no > |> kiddin', ninty-five%) do run! > |> This is even better than what Atari self hoped for, and it is MUCH better > |> than what the TT can show up with. I have a TT and have little problems to > |> get the software I need. > |> > > Yeah... There's a small problem with that though... Atari said to all the > magazine publishers that the Falcon wasn't particularly supposed to be compatible > with the STe, so that's what their writing. The games press are saying that the > A1200 is better 'cause 60% of standard Amiga stuff (exactly what that means I'm > not sure) will run. > > A good bit to get people flaming is... > > With regard to A500 games... > > 60% of A600 stuff runs on the A1200 > 80% of A500+ stuff runs on the A600 > 50% of A500 stuff runs on the A500+. > NOT to start a flame war here, but a note on math. since 50% of the games run on a 500+ and only 80% of those run on a 600 and of those only 60% run on the 1200. Now, I don't know about you but if you pump it out, lets use an aribtrary number like 100 ok?(NOTE I know there are more than 100 programs available for the Amiga.) 50% of 100 is 50. 80% of 50 is 40. 60% of 40 is 24! So 24 out of 100 games should work on the 1200. Personally, I don't find this all to comforting, especially considering the shape that the world is in today. Are you going to spend that much money on a system that only can use less than a quarter of the available programs for it? see 24/100. > Which in total isn't a particularly good compatibility rating! > > :-) > > David. /^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\ [ Mark Santora ] [ DLK0MS9S@umiami.ir.miami.edu ] [ GEnie : M.SANTORA2 Look with more than your eyes... ] \____________________________________________________________________/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan10.110720.14311@umiami.ir.miami.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!news.miami.edu!umiami!dlk0ms9sReferences:
<H.mcBUgFWEjuY@fredrik.atari.no> <1993Jan9.150240@cs.bham.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!news.miami.edu!umiami!dlk0ms9s From: dlk0ms9s@umiami.ir.miami.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: The compatibility story (Falcon & A1200) Message-ID: <1993Jan10.110720.14311@umiami.ir.miami.edu> Date: 10 Jan 93 11:07:19 EST References: <H.mcBUgFWEjuY@fredrik.atari.no> <1993Jan9.150240@cs.bham.ac.uk> Organization: Univ of Miami IR Lines: 61