Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #22902Re: STalker vs Uniterm?
From: John Cordes
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:14
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:14
22 lines
1465 bytes
1465 bytes
In article <3_800_842_fidonet2b57bb25@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au>, michael.smith@f842.n800.z3.fido.zeta.org.au (michael smith) writes: > Original to: ken@isgtec.com > In a message of <10 Jan 93 05:43:54>, ken@isgtec.com (3:713/602) writes: > <material deleted> > If you only have an ST, use Uniterm, you don't have the speed or need for > anything more. > > If you have a Mega STe, an accelerated ST, or a TT, use either STalker > (whose VT100 is pretty good when you set it up right, particularly if you > disable it's default behaviour of clearing the history buffer on a > clear-home) or CoNnect, which is as close to flawless as I have ever seen a > terminal emulator get. > I like STalker very much, but I do find the occasional clearing of the history buffer to be a nuisance. It seems to me that Eric R./Gribnif claimed that it would be too hard to detect the control sequences that do that, when running in VT100 mode; do you know of a way to overcome the problem? Thanks. John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan21.121423.10420@ac.dal.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!sifon!newsflash.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!ac.dal.ca!cordesReferences:
<3_800_842_fidonet2b57bb25@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!sifon!newsflash.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!ac.dal.ca!cordes From: cordes@ac.dal.ca (John Cordes) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: STalker vs Uniterm? Keywords: stalker,vt100 Message-ID: <1993Jan21.121423.10420@ac.dal.ca> Date: 21 Jan 93 16:14:23 GMT References: <3_800_842_fidonet2b57bb25@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au> Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Lines: 22