Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #22914Re: STalker vs Uniterm?
From: Wolfgang Wander
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:23
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:23
17 lines
1374 bytes
1374 bytes
> > If you have a Mega STe, an accelerated ST, or a TT, use either STalker
> > (whose VT100 is pretty good when you set it up right, particularly if you
> > disable it's default behaviour of clearing the history buffer on a
> > clear-home) or CoNnect, which is as close to flawless as I have ever seen a
> > terminal emulator get.
> >
> I like STalker very much, but I do find the occasional clearing of the
> history buffer to be a nuisance. It seems to me that Eric R./Gribnif
> claimed that it would be too hard to detect the control sequences that do
> that, when running in VT100 mode; do you know of a way to overcome the
> problem? Thanks.
In CoNnect your history buffer won't become cleared on a clear-home.
The whole screen at the moment of the clear-home is saved to the
history buffer. This seems to be the right solution to me.
WOlfgang
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan21.202316.10999@dxcern.cern.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!dxcern!vsnhda!wwcReferences:
<3_800_842_fidonet2b57bb25@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au> <1993Jan21.121423.10420@ac.dal.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!dxcern!vsnhda!wwc From: wwc@vsnhda.cern.ch (Wolfgang Wander) Subject: Re: STalker vs Uniterm? Message-ID: <1993Jan21.202316.10999@dxcern.cern.ch> Keywords: stalker,vt100 Sender: news@dxcern.cern.ch (USENET News System) Organization: European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva References: <3_800_842_fidonet2b57bb25@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au> <1993Jan21.121423.10420@ac.dal.ca> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:23:16 GMT Lines: 18