🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1jkfpeINNr5j@golem.wcc.govt.nz> wells_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.122015.25870@email.tuwien.ac.at>, nino@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Marinos Yannikos) writes:
>>I agree! A comp.sys.atari.st.advocacy group should be
>>created as soon as possible!
>
>WHo thinks that this would actually help!?  People are going to be
>abusing the posters of messages in this group.  If no-one posts in an
>advocacy group, there won't be anyone to flame, so they'll just come
>straight back to c.s.a.s!

If a c.s.a.s.advoc group existed then responsible netters who occasionally
indulge in flame wars can use this group for any inflamitary followups, and
irresponsible users can be put in kill files.
  I am currently considering putting several people in my kill file because
they tend to contribute to flame wars, but I don't want to miss anything
useful they might have to say.
  I think a general review of the atari newsgroups should take place once
we see how popular the Falcon is(n't).  Perhaps a c.s.a.falcon should be
created to deal with Falcon specific postings and possibly multi-tos on other
machines.

****************** CREATE comp.sys.atari.st.advocacy NOW ********************

- Leo