Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #23048Re: ISO, Atari Corporate History material
From: 01mbmccabe
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:17
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:17
43 lines
2868 bytes
2868 bytes
> gmg@unify.com (Gary M. Gealy) writes: > >> Can anyone out there point me in the right direction for some information on > Atari corporate history? > > Bright in the mid 80s, went down the shitter after that... > > Thanks to the Tramiels. That's not entirely correct, and somewhat over-generalized. Any peaks Atari had over its entire history have been mild. Ever since Bushnell left the company it's been on a spiral down the tubes. Do you have any idea how many CEO's Atari had between Bushnell (late 70's?) and the Trameil's (early to mid 80's?) I read a case study in my Principles of Management class a few years ago, and I seem to remember about 4 (give or take one). One of the later CEO's was imported by Warner from the _textile_ industry! Unless you can think of a way to make a solid company out of practices like this, you should probably thank the Tramiel's for buying Atari and not letting it go straight down the toilet like Warner was! If you want to criticize Jack Tramiel for not running the company in a 'perfect' manner, you probably can, but remember, and think how much more Atari is exposed to their customer's (yopu and me) critical eye more than say IBM or ANY of the clone comanies, or the Apple Corp. Maybe Atari should takeon practices more like Apple and company, and keep us more at arms length so they could work out their problems without all of us knowing every little detail. I personally can't find a legitimate way to criticize them much, as, Jack Tramiel's and my positiopn were reversed I would probably do thing with just as much apparent logic. Also, as far as the microcomputer market is concerned, I don't think there is _that) teremendous of a difference between Atari's future and IBM's. (The key there is what market I am talking about -- IBM does business in MANY other markets than that of the microcomputer!) I really don't think the current 80x86 line can be considered to be a large part of their future due mostly to the clone market, so they will not have so great of footing as one might think. This will make Atari, Apple, and IBM much more competitive with each other. I think it will be very similar to how it was in the mid-80's, with the exception that Apple will obviously have a much larger share of the market than it did then. -Matt the economic forecaster!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan22.161719.13988@bsu-ucs>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!bsu-cs!bsu-ucs.uucp!01mbmccabeReferences:
<5lmal83@Unify.Com> <1jo05pINNiok@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!bsu-cs!bsu-ucs.uucp!01mbmccabe From: 01mbmccabe@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: ISO, Atari Corporate History material Message-ID: <1993Jan22.161719.13988@bsu-ucs> Date: 22 Jan 93 21:17:19 GMT References: <5lmal83@Unify.Com> <1jo05pINNiok@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's Lines: 43