Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #23231a blurb
From: 01mbmccabe
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 06:51
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 06:51
53 lines
2870 bytes
2870 bytes
>>And doesn't NEED a Hard Drive to run!! > > Big deal. Get a hard drive anyway. They're cheap. Say bud...if they're so cheap, why donl;t you mail me the money order for a new one? I don't happen to have the cash, nor, I would bet, do a lot of other people. I may guess this may be even more so in a smaller, foreign country. I'll keep my eye on the mail and continue to run my software from the RAMdisk so I won't be holding my breath. >>OS/2 and windows are HUGE > > Huge by 1985 (ST creation date) standards, maybe. Not by "real OS" > standards. You really have to try using a real OS sometime before you > pass judgement on these things. > >>and VERY expensive > > That's a GOOD one. $50 is *real* tough to manage for an OS, yeah. Up the amount of the money order, please. > Right, and consequently you have to pay $75 to upgrade the OS. That > is, every 3 years when they fix the pending 100 bugs in TOS. I'm still using very old version of TOS (1.2 I think) and have no plans for spending money to upgrade it. BTW, I see you suddenly got a little tight with the purse-strings....hmm. >>MS-Doze is the standard on IBM clones, and it is VERY under-productive! > > What, exactly, do you DO with your ST that would be so much more > unproductively done on a PC? And in terms of calls, TOS is more > minimal than DOS is. And there IS no CLI for the ST, as far as Atari > is concerned. Only the (snicker) GEM desktop. What's the point to trying to get a PC put together the right way to do what I want it to do, for less cost than my MEGA ST4? Too bad more people didn't find out about ST's when I did. There'd probably be less people hell-bent on a hard drive/the latest-greatest 'x86 PC/super-workhorse/more-than-they- need/1000. And I have no qualms with GEM. Oh well, you and the Jones' have fun competing with each other. I'm gonna see if I can get something done here. P.S. Why are the only people who actively promote the clones _I know_, the ones who are able to hook up with _pirate copies_ of the hard-drive munching, processing-time gobbling software they rave about? I reckon a large number of people would sing a different song if they _had_ to play by the rules. Not to mention they wouldn't be able to afford to fill those bulging hard-drives their shiney new system sports. -Matt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan11.015110.13461@bsu-ucs>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!bsu-cs!bsu-ucs.uucp!01mbmccabeReferences:
<C0Furt.I67@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <H.ea.7tZUy7WdW&k@semprini.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca> <1iobpvINN79q@golem.wcc.govt.nz> <1iojg0INNjna@life.ai.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!bsu-cs!bsu-ucs.uucp!01mbmccabe From: 01mbmccabe@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: a blurb Message-ID: <1993Jan11.015110.13461@bsu-ucs> Date: 11 Jan 93 06:51:10 GMT References: <C0Furt.I67@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <H.ea.7tZUy7WdW&k@semprini.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca> <1iobpvINN79q@golem.wcc.govt.nz> <1iojg0INNjna@life.ai.mit.edu> Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's Lines: 53