🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3069@islenet.UUCP> jons@islenet.UUCP (Jonathan Spangler) writes:
?In article <44@s.cc.purdue.edu> afo@s.cc.purdue.edu.UUCP (Alan Davis) writes:
?>In article <1274@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) writes:
?>>Gee Neil, you should have come over to the Commodore booth - we were online,
?>>matter of fact we wouldn't have come if we had to stay off the net for more
?>                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
?>>than a day or two.
?>
?>Oh grow up George. Don't you have anything else better to do with your time?
?>...
?Pretty strong words there -- sounds like a Bible thumping Atarist to me.
?I am agreeing with you, but I think you should have put a **FLAME ON**
?to warn us (or George) at the beginning.

Oh George, may the great protector ":-)" open up upon your postings and protect
you from the rabble and these fine gentlemen :-).  Seriously folks, the Amiga
is a fine computer which is just getting its stride.  All this hope for the
atari is nice, but come on the amiga is a small business machine for the techno
age.  Small bands, tv commercial graphics, teleprompters, computers for the
blind, desktop publishing, etc..  Please pardon my enthusiasm, it may be
excessive.  There are many possibilities here.

-- 
    Jim Hutchison   		UUCP:	{dcdwest,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!hutch
		    		ARPA:	Hutch@sdcsvax.ucsd.edu
Never seems to be enough resolution, memory, or speed, now why is that?