Differenes among those 16mhz accelerators

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st

Article #2490

#2490

From: Z4648252
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 1989 03:20

18 lines
1230 bytes

    Could someone in the 'know' make a recommendation or mini-review
on the various accelerators?  After reading various comments, I'm
not sure what the alleged best one is.
    I get the impression that those with caches are not good to
use due to the fact that not all programs can handle that
technique.  Yet, the cached accelerator appears to give the greater
speed.
    The cost savings on the ones without caches is significant.
    At any rate, I'm a bit confused.  I'll be going to the
World of Atari at Dallas and want to buy the 'correct' accelerator.
    If anyone can make some recommendations....  Also, in the
discussion, let's not bring the Turbo ST into the evaluation.  I
already plan on getting that.  I'm only confused with the
accelerator.
    Thanks!

Larry Rymal in East Texas <Z4648252@SFAUSTIN.BITNET>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <890719.21204977.003162@SFA.CP6>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SFAUSTIN.BITNET!Z4648252

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SFAUSTIN.BITNET!Z4648252
From: Z4648252@SFAUSTIN.BITNET (Z4648252)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Differenes among those 16mhz accelerators
Message-ID: <890719.21204977.003162@SFA.CP6>
Date: 20 Jul 89 03:20:50 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 18