🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <165@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> braner@batcomputer.UUCP (braner) writes:
>We hear that comp.sys.atari.st is overflowing.  I.e., "they" measure by
>newsgroup traffic.  The obvious solution: split the newsgroup into two
>or three!  I suggest we have:
>
>	1)	A general ST discussion group
>	2)	A distribution method of PD ST executable programs
>	3)	A separate distribution of source code of programs
>
>2) and 3) can be Usenet newsgroups, but don't HAVE to be.  And perhaps 2)
>SHOULD be moderated, i.e. someone could make sure the copy is good before
>it is sent to everybody.  Also, the number of copies sent will be smaller,
>since many people reading this newsgroup are not interested in the source
>code, and some not even in the executables.
>
>- Moshe Braner

Good idea! Same structure as the Mac-users have. But how do we get this
'across'?

Is there a way of informing the people that are referred to
as "the powers that be"?

I don't think there could be any objection to this idea. It would make
the ST_section a lot more interesting!


Oo + oO
   |