🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <657@sask.UUCP> long@sask.UUCP (Warren Long) writes:
>
>I now feel that PROFF is superior to all the word processors out
>for the ATARI.  The main feature is the automatic generation of the
>Table of Contents.
>
	Thank you. I am glad to hear this, although when I wrote it,
	I did not think that it would be useful.

>However,  it is just pitiful when trying to do BOLDFACE or
>UNDERLINE.  I know tht backspace is a handyway to do things so that
>they work on anything, but it is painfully slow, especially when I
>know that my printer is being slowed to a tenth of its speed.

	You are absolutely right. It is a bad way of doing things,
	but at the time, I did not know any better. Call it nroff
	syndrome. :-)
>
>Since I have the source to PROFF, I intend on getting into it, and
>enabling it to do the things it does do CORRECTLY, and to maybe
>add somemore features, like ITALICS, etc.  I am going to set this up
>to work with an EPSON FX-80 compatible printer, (the industry
>standard for an ST??).
>
>Has anyone already done this??  Am I wasting my time??
>
	To my knowledge, nobody has done the "right" things to it.
	Proff has all the problems of a "first" system. It badly
	needs a re-write, by using ditroff-style structures internally.
	[ditroff internals is well documented in a btl memo]
	All changes/additions without a re-write would be (in my
	opinion) time-wasting hacks. Sigh... I wish I had the time.

>Warren

	oz
-- 
Creativity 		Usenet: [decvax|ihnp4]!utzoo!yetti!oz
	never goes	      anything!seismo!mnetor!yetti!oz
	unpunished.	Bitnet: oz@[yusol|yuyetti].BITNET
		oz.	Phonet: [416] 736-5053 x 3976