Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #26370Re: I'm caught in NETS
From: pgtrubey
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1987 19:35
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1987 19:35
95 lines
5359 bytes
5359 bytes
In article <8704171752.AA06429@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> goertzel@DCA-EMS.ARPA (Herbert Goertzel) writes:
> In reading the digests I come across USENET, BITNET,
> CSNet, UUCP, BIX, etc. I have no idea what all these nets are, who controls
> them, how I can connect to them, what they are. There are many references to
> UH-INFO at UHUPVM1 ATARINET. Is this another net? Is it on one of the nets
> mentioned above? Can I get to it from ARPANET?
>
> Thanks for any help, I'm lost.
Well, here's my stab... Please forgive my inaccuracies. I'd be interested
in knowing if and where I have erred...
USENET - Sometimes refered to as the 'UUCP network'. Anarchistic network
with no central authority. UUCP started years ago when a couple
of Unix using universities in the States decided that they wanted
to transfer some data/programs back and forth. Someone put
together a set of programs and protocals, called UUCP, that would
automatically transfer data from one Unix machine to another
using modems and phone lines. Soon many universities wanted
to get in on act, and so the 'network' grew, each site paying
their own share of long-distance phone charges. It wasn't long
before someone decided to write up an electronic mail
program to use the UUCP protocals, and then news programs.
Since its beginning, the UUCP network has grown to an estimated
6500 sites spread throughout the world, with an estimated
820,000 people being connected to UUCP via their Unix machines.
The thing that I find the most remarkable about USENET is that
there *is* no central authority, the network has been 'managed'
via distributed volunteer effort. To use USENET, you generally
must have a login on some Unix machine that is connected to any
UUCP site.
Couple of notes: UUCP is a store and forward network operating
mostly over public phone lines at relatively low baud rates. So
an e-mail message going from North America to Japan may take
a few days, and travel thorough a dozen machines.
BITNET - Don't know too much about the organization of this network,
except that it is a network of mainframe IBM type machines.
It is an interactive network with fast response times, single
line messages may be shuttled around the world in a matter of
seconds to minutes. I think this too is a store and forward
network, but don't quote me on this. Again, to use BITNET
I think you'd have to be logged onto a mainframe IBM type
computer. Note that BITNET is refered as NETNORTH in Canada,
and EARN (I think) in Europe.
UH-INFO at ATARINET and stuff refers to a BITNET site. I think
you'll have to be using BITNET to access the information
contained there.
CSNET - Don't know about this one...
BIX - The "Byte Information eXchange". Anyone can access this network.
via Tymnet in the US, Datapac in Canada or some other dial up
packet switching network elsewhere in the world. The only catch
for this one is that you pay $$. You pay some money to Byte
to use the exchange, and some money to the packet network to
access the exchange. Note that BIX isn't really a network,
just a large bulletin board: ie it is centralized, all people
'logon' to a central set of computers.
FIDONET - A network of bulletin board systems. e-mail is supported
within the network, and so is some form of news, or mailing
lists. Again, a store and forward type of network operating
over phone lines.
ARPANET - This is the grandfather of all large networks. It is run
centrally by the Dept. of Defense in the US, and as such
only US sites are allowed on the ARPANET. ARPANET is a fast
store and forward network using dedicated communication lines.
It has and does serve at least two purposes that I know of.
First it's a great testbed for discovering and implementing
new algorithms for wide area network management. Second
it provides users with rapid communications with all other
ARPA users via electronic mail and mailing lists.
Gateways and such...
Most of these networks are gatewayed to each other. That is, you can
access one network from another. Unfortunately I don't know too
much about the current state of all the gateways... maybe someone
who did could post a summary of possible access from one network
to another, both for news and e-mail?
I've probably not mentioned some other networks, so consider this a
partial list.
Hope this helps...
--
Phil Trubey
pgtrubey@watlion.UUCP !{allegra,clyde,decvax,ihnp4}!watmath!watlion!pgtrubey
pgtrubey%watlion%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA
pgtrubey%watlion@waterloo.CSNET pgtrubey@watlion.waterloo.EDU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7993@watlion.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watlion!pgtrubeyReferences:
<8704171752.AA06429@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watlion!pgtrubey From: pgtrubey@watlion.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: I'm caught in NETS Message-ID: <7993@watlion.UUCP> Date: Sat, 18-Apr-87 14:35:08 EST Article-I.D.: watlion.7993 Posted: Sat Apr 18 14:35:08 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 19-Apr-87 02:28:51 EST References: <8704171752.AA06429@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: pgtrubey@watlion.UUCP (Phil Trubey) Distribution: world Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 95