Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #26480Downgrading Uniterm?
From: PRINS
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1987 11:47
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1987 11:47
31 lines
1828 bytes
1828 bytes
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 87 12:43 N
From: <PRINS@HLERUL5.BITNET> (R. Prins - Network Mgr. [DEC Sites] RU Leiden)
Subject: Downgrading Uniterm?
To: info-atari16@score.stanford.edu
X-Original-To: info-atari16@score.stanford.edu, PRINS
At the moment there is quite a discussion about how Uniterm can
be stripped to consume less memory.
As far as I know, Uniterm is currently the best terminal emulator
package currently available for the ST. And not even a commercial
product! I personally like the development in the direction of a
VT240(1?) terminal very much. Simon Poole should be fully encouraged
to continue the good work.
That's one reason I do'nt think he should be encouraged to put much
time in making a downgraded version of Uniterm.
Another reason is: What's the problem in using a couple of Ks of memory?
I expect that in the middle of 1988 a 4Mb ST will be the standard
configuration for an ST. Using 512K for a terminal emulator will be absolutely
no problem then.
Greetings,
R. Prins,
Centraal Rekeninstituut,
University of Leiden.
<My employer has nothing to do with this!>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8704241046.AA10412@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!HLERUL5.BITNET!PRINSShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!HLERUL5.BITNET!PRINS From: PRINS@HLERUL5.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Downgrading Uniterm? Message-ID: <8704241046.AA10412@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Fri, 24-Apr-87 06:47:17 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8704241046.AA10412 Posted: Fri Apr 24 06:47:17 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Apr-87 18:48:49 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 31